Best trail running poles: what they are, how to choose and how to use them – Guide 2026

Why use poles in trail running?

The use of poles in trail running—especially over long distances and on courses with significant elevation gain—has evolved from being a “choice” into a true race and training strategy.

They act as both a “suspension system” and a “force multiplier,” integrating upper-body power into an activity traditionally dominated by the legs.

Here is a detailed breakdown of why carbon poles are an essential extension of a trail runner’s body.

Reduction of joint stress and injury prevention

This is the most frequently cited advantage, and its long-term impact on a runner’s career is invaluable.

Poles help improve:

• downhill impact management: downhill running generates the highest joint stress. Each step on steep or technical terrain can produce impact forces two to three times body weight. When used correctly, poles actively absorb part of these forces, acting as additional “brakes.”
  By partially replacing the braking action of the quadriceps and knee stabilizers, they significantly reduce the risk of inflammation, tendinitis, and the dreaded patellofemoral pain syndrome (runner’s knee).
• Load distribution: using poles distributes body weight across four limbs instead of two. This reduces localized muscle fatigue and long-term stress on knee and ankle cartilage and ligaments.

Better balance, stability and safety on technical terrain

When running over rocks, scree, unstable ground or water crossings, balance is precarious and a fall can mean the end of the race.

Poles provide:

• additional contact points: they create a “four-point stance,” dramatically increasing stability. On unstable terrain, you can probe the ground before stepping, reducing the risk of sprains or slips
• quick reaction support: in case of stumbling or loss of traction, leaning on poles can prevent a full fall—turning a potential injury into a minor imbalance.

Uphill support: power transfer and muscle saving

Uphill is where poles become true “turbo boosters.”

They allow:

• extended muscle engagement: poles engage back, shoulders, chest, and arm muscles in propulsion. Instead of relying solely on quadriceps and glutes, you activate a larger muscular chain. This increases push power while distributing effort, giving crucial relief to the legs.
• Optimal trunk angle: poles help maintain a more upright torso, facilitating breathing and oxygen flow. On extreme gradients, they allow you to “pull yourself up,” transforming a grueling hike into efficient forward progress.

Greater energy efficiency over long distances (running economy)

For ultra-trail runners, energy management is the key to success.

Poles improve running economy by ensuring:

• Steady pacing: they help maintain a consistent uphill rhythm, avoiding energy spikes that rapidly deplete glycogen stores.
• Supplementary “fuel”: although using the arms requires energy, that energy often comes from fresher muscle groups compared to fatigued legs. Energy expenditure becomes more evenly distributed, delaying overall fatigue. Studies show that while poles slightly increase total oxygen consumption, they significantly reduce perceived exertion and leg fatigue.
• Late-race assistance: when your legs are destroyed after dozens of kilometers, the ability to push with your arms becomes crucial to keep moving effectively.

In summary, carbon trail running poles are not mere accessories—they are strategic biomechanical devices that optimize propulsion, protect the body from wear and increase safety, ultimately enhancing performance and athletic longevity.

For this reason, their low weight (thanks to carbon) is of vital importance.

What to look for in the best trail running poles

Finding the optimal pole requires balancing six key parameters. Every choice involves a trade-off between performance, reliability, and cost.

Weight: the measure of performance (and fatigue)

In trail running, especially in Ultra races, weight is directly proportional to the muscle fatigue accumulated in the arms and shoulders. Lifting a pole that is even 50 grams heavier hundreds of times can cost hours of energy.

High-end carbon models aim to stay under 150 grams per pole (120 cm), while a weight between 180 and 200 grams is considered an excellent compromise between lightness and strength at a more affordable cost.

The Q/P/R ratio: ultra-lightweight models (under 150g) are expensive and inherently less durable (carbon is more ‘fragile’). For the best ratio, aim for the 160-180 gram range, where the difference in performance is minimal, but the cost savings and gain in durability are significant.

Material: rigidity vs resilience

Carbon fibre is the preferred material due to its exceptional rigidity (energy transfer) and minimal weight.

However, its known weakness is its poor resistance to lateral impacts: unlike aluminium, which bends (plastic deformation), carbon can break cleanly (catastrophic failure).

The main types of carbon used in trail running poles are:

• high modulus carbon (HRC max): maximum lightness and rigidity, but high cost and lower resistance. Used in competition models
• standard carbon or C/Alu alloys: more economical and impact resistant (thanks to the lower carbon modulus or combination with aluminium), but slightly heavier. Offers the best strength/price ratio.

The Q/P/R ratio: if you are not a professional, a pole made of a sturdy carbon alloy or standard modulus carbon offers the durability you need for trail running, protecting your investment.

Folding system: speed and compactness

The ability to quickly store or retrieve poles is essential during a race.

Depending on the folding system, poles can be divided into:

• Z-Fold (or segmented folding): these are the standard for trail running. They consist of 3-4 segments joined by an internal cable (often made of Kevlar). Extremely quick to assemble and disassemble (with a ‘button’ gesture), they are very compact when closed (approximately 35-40 cm). The internal mechanism must be robust and not wear out with dust.
• Telescopic (adjustable): more common in trekking, they are less used in trail racing due to their greater weight and the potential risk of the lock slipping. However, their versatility is useful for those who share equipment or for beginners.
• Monoblock (fixed length): the lightest and most rigid of all, as they have no joints. They are only ideal for those who never have to store them or for Vertical K races. They lack versatility.

The Q/P/R ratio: the Z-Fold system offers the ideal balance. Choose models with a high-quality internal locking mechanism to ensure they do not open or close accidentally.

Grip and strap/glove system

The grip is your constant contact with the pole and directly affects comfort and efficiency.

It is distinguished by several characteristics:

• material:
  • EVA (foam): lightweight, soft and offers excellent grip even when wet. It is the modern standard for trail running.
  • Cork: absorbs sweat effectively and offers superior thermal comfort (neither too hot nor too cold). It tends to be slightly heavier than EVA.
• Shape: the best trail grips are elongated (or have a foam extension below the main grip). This allows the runner to grip the pole lower when climbing or traversing, without having to adjust the length (known as “side-hilling”).
• Lace/Glove (Shark System): patented systems (such as Leki’s Trail Shark) that allow you to attach your hand to the pole with a lace or detachable glove. This transmits the pushing force directly to the shaft and allows the hand to relax partially, reducing forearm fatigue. It is an efficiency factor that often justifies a higher price.

Locking system: safety and reliability

In folding and telescopic models, locking is essential.

There are three types of locking mechanisms for trail running poles:

• external lever (flick lock): mainly used on telescopic segments, it is quick to adjust and reliable, but can add a little weight
• internal push button: the most common mechanism for Z-Fold poles. A spring-loaded button locks when the pole is fully extended. It must be easy to operate even when wearing gloves
• magnetic/mechanical: hybrid systems, such as those for attaching gloves (Leki), which ensure quick release and attachment for safety or convenience.

The Q/P/R ratio: a proven (often patented) locking system is crucial for safety and reliability. Avoid low-cost models with locking mechanisms that have negative reviews for slippage or premature wear.

Price: justifying the investment

The price range (€70 – €200) reflects the quality and quantity of technology incorporated.

Depending on the cost, poles are divided into:

• low range (up to €100): often lower modulus carbon or composite (carbon/aluminium), with simple EVA grips and basic folding systems. A good starting point for beginners.
• Mid-range (€100 – €170): the golden mean of Q/P/R. Good quality carbon, competitive weight (160-190g), and the introduction of elongated ergonomic grips and reliable locking systems (e.g. C.A.M.P., Raidlight).
• High range (over €170): extreme lightness (under 150g), high modulus carbon, patented glove/quick release systems (e.g. Leki Shark), and competition-optimised design. The price increase here is linked to a marginal reduction in weight and an increase in technical efficiency.

The Q/P/R ratio: for the ideal balance, focus your search on the mid-range (€100-€170). Here you will find carbon that is light enough and systems that are robust enough to withstand the rigours of trail running without breaking the bank.

Top 10 best trail running poles 2026

After thoroughly examining the technical criteria, it is time to apply them to the leading products on the market.

Our final selection for 2025 focuses on models that achieve the best balance between the extreme lightness of carbon, adequate strength for trail use and, above all, a price that justifies the technology offered.

Here is the final selection of the best carbon trail running poles, with an analysis that goes beyond simple weight.

The selection of models presented here covers the entire spectrum of trail runners’ needs: from the search for extreme lightness (and the associated cost) to the need for a sturdy and economical pole.

The analysis focuses on why these poles stand out in terms of the crucial relationship between weight, price and resistance (Q/P/R).

Gipron Montblanc Carbon 310 Matrix

• Weight and Material: 140 g per pair (120 cm), 100% carbon.
• System: 4-section foldable, folds down to approximately 40 cm for easy transport
• Price: €115-135
• Q/P/R Analysis: this is a balanced option in the world of foldable trail running poles. The 4-section folding system is practical and compact: when closed, they measure approximately 40 cm, making them easy to store in a backpack or pole holder during technical sections. The foam grip with fixed strap is comfortable even on longer outings.

• Product Link

Raidlight Ultralight Carbon

• Weight and Material: 100–110 g, Carbon
• System: Z-fold folding
• Grip: 3D EVA
• Price: €160–170
• Q/P/R Analysis: it strikes an excellent balance between extreme lightness and a slightly lower price point than other top-of-the-range models. The Made in France design emphasises lightness and compactness. It is a solid choice for those who prioritise weight and are willing to pay a premium for craftsmanship and performance, but still want a foldable pole.

• Link al Prodotto

LEKI Ultratrail FX.One Superlite

• Weight and Material: 129–142 g, carbon.
• System: foldable in 3 sections.
• Handle: Trail Shark with detachable glove.
• Price: €160–180.
• Q/P/R Analysis: Leki’s added value lies in the Trail Shark system, which optimises thrust and energy efficiency by allowing quick attachment and detachment, essential when refuelling or on flat sections. Although not the lightest, its weight is still competitive, and it is considered by many to be the best model for thrust efficiency over long distances.
• Link al Prodotto

Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z

• Weight and Material: ≈ 140 g, Carbon
• System: Z-fold folding
• Price: €150–170
• Q/P/R Analysis: this is the folding version of the Distance Carbon, a masterpiece of balance. It offers a lightness close to that of extreme models but with the practicality and reliability of the Z-fold system, crucial for quickly storing the poles. It is often cited as the best Q/P/R compromise in the high-end range, ideal for runners who need a sturdy and easily stowable racing tool.
• Link al Prodotto

Komperdell FXP Carbon Ultra

• Weight and Material: ≈ 140 g, Carbon
• System: foldable with automatic FXP technology
• Price: €140–170
• Q/P/R Analysis: Komperdell offers a very reliable carbon construction, but stands out for its FXP system. This automatic locking and assembly mechanism is extremely fast, making the poles ready for use in an instant. It is a premium option for those looking for precision craftsmanship and speed of use.

• Link al Prodotto

Salomon S/Lab Ultra Carbon

• Weight and Material: ≈ 135 g, Carbon
• System: foldable
• Price: €140–150
• Q/P/R Analysis: developed in collaboration with top-level athletes, S/Lab poles are optimised for trail running ergonomics. They offer excellent torsional rigidity and minimal weight. They are recommended for runners looking for maximum compactness and a design specifically geared towards performance.
• Link al Prodotto

TSL Outdoor Trail Carbon 4 Magnetic Cork

• Weight and Material: ≈ 140–150 g, Carbon.
• System: 4 magnetic sections.
• Handle: cork with magnetic lock
• Price: €110–120
• Q/P/R Analysis: this model is the top choice for those who run long distances and seek maximum comfort. The cork handle is superior for sweat management and thermal insulation. The magnetic system facilitates quick release of the lace. Excellent value for money in the mid-range.
• Link al Prodotto

C.A.M.P. Sky Carbon EVO

• Weight and Material: ≈ 200 g, Carbon
• System: 5-segment folding with internal cord and micro-adjustment of tension
• Price: €80–100
• Q/P/R Analysis: the mix of carbon and aluminium offers a good balance between weight and strength: at ~400 g per pair, it is in a lower range than top competition models, but still adequate for long walks or non-extreme technical trails. Micro-adjustment of tension with internal cord and aluminium clip make fitting quick and secure, while differentiated ergonomic straps improve comfort and control.
• Link al Prodotto

AONIJIE 3K Carbon Fiber E4214

• Link al Prodotto

Naturehike ST10 Ultralight Telescopic

• Weight and Material: ≈ 150 g, Carbon
• System: Telescopic (adjustable)
• Price: €60–80
• Q/P/R Analysis: this is the most versatile option in terms of length, while maintaining an acceptable weight thanks to the carbon. The telescopic system is heavier and slower than the Z-Fold, so less suitable for racing, but perfect for fast hiking, light trekking or as an adjustable pole for beginners. The best Q/P if versatility is more important than storage speed.
• Link al Prodotto

Advanced technical considerations: what to know before buying

Purchasing carbon trail running poles requires a clear understanding of the technical specifications that define their behavior on the trail.

Every component is an essential gear in optimizing the weight/performance ratio.

Shaft material: pure carbon, aluminum or hybrid

Material choice is the primary factor influencing weight, price, and durability.

• Carbon (carbon fiber):

  • Advantages: extremely lightweight (minimizing weight is essential in trail running) and exceptionally stiff. The stiffness ensures that the energy applied during the push is transferred immediately to the ground without being lost in pole flex. Ideal for competition and performance.

  • Disadvantages: high cost. Its rigidity makes it fragile under lateral impacts (catastrophic breakage).

• Aluminum (7075 alloy):

  • Advantages: much more affordable and, above all, far more resistant to impacts and torsion. When subjected to excessive loads, aluminum bends (plastic deformation) rather than snapping, offering greater reliability and durability on highly technical terrain or in extreme conditions. Suitable for technical hiking and heavy use.

  • Disadvantages: heavier and less stiff than carbon, which reduces push efficiency.

• Hybrid poles (carbon + aluminum):

  • Optimal compromise: many brands use aluminum sections in the areas most prone to breakage (for example, the lower segment) and carbon in the main shaft. They offer an excellent balance between lightness (thanks to carbon) and durability (thanks to aluminum) at a mid-range price. Ideal for the ultra trail runner seeking a balance between performance and safety.

Folding system: speed, compactness and rigidity

The folding system determines how easily the poles can be stored in a backpack or running belt.

• Z-Fold (or folding segment poles):

  • Features: three or four segments connected by an internal cable (often made of Kevlar). They can be assembled or disassembled in just a few seconds by pressing a button or pulling the handle.

  • Ideal for: trail running and racing. Maximum compactness (usually 35–40 cm when folded) and light weight. The system is inherently stiff.

• Telescopic (adjustable):

  • Features: two or three sections that slide into one another, locked by an external lever system (Flick Lock) or a twist-lock mechanism.

  • Ideal for: trekking and versatile use. Allows on-the-go length adjustment (useful on traverses or when sharing poles with others). Heavier and slower to store compared to Z-Fold models.

• Fixed-length (one-piece):

  • Features: a single piece of carbon.

  • Ideal for: maximum performance. Offers the absolute highest level of lightness and stiffness, but cannot be stored in a small backpack. A niche choice for Vertical races or sprint events.

Grip and strap system

The interface between the runner and the pole is crucial for both comfort and efficiency.

• EVA (foam):

  • Advantages: extremely lightweight, soft, and provides excellent grip even when hands are sweaty or wet. Very common in trail running.

• Cork:

  • Advantages: improves thermal comfort (it doesn’t overheat or get cold like other materials) and naturally absorbs sweat. Ideal for long distances. It tends to be slightly heavier.

• Trail Shark Glove (or quick-release systems):

  • Advantages: proprietary systems (such as the Leki Trail Shark) that replace the traditional strap with a glove that quickly attaches and detaches from the handle (often via a magnetic mechanism). It significantly improves propulsion and energy efficiency, allowing the hand to relax. A must for runners seeking maximum power transfer.

• Extended grip:
  The handle extends downward with EVA foam for about 15–20 cm. This allows the runner to grip the pole lower on climbs without stopping to adjust the length.

Our TRM Coaches suggest making full use of the glove and strap system, especially on uphill sections, to improve propulsion. However, it is essential to be cautious in downhill sections or on rocky terrain. If a pole gets stuck in a crack, the lever effect can strain the wrist and potentially cause injury (even fractures).

Tip and basket: grip and terrain adaptation

The tip of the pole provides the necessary traction.

The main features of tips and baskets are:

• Tungsten (or carbide) tip:

  • Function: this is the standard and hardest material used. It provides maximum grip on hard surfaces such as rock, ice, roots, and concrete, preventing slipping. Wear is minimal.

• Small baskets (or trail baskets):

  • Function: they have a reduced diameter. They are ideal for trail running because they don’t get caught between rocks or vegetation.

• Large baskets (or snow/mud baskets):

  • Function: they have a wider diameter. They are designed to prevent the pole from sinking into soft terrain such as fresh snow, deep sand, or thick mud. Many trail poles allow you to replace the baskets.

Understanding these four technical elements allows you to base your choice not only on price or weight, but to select the carbon pole that perfectly matches your running style and the terrain you tackle.

Which pole should you choose based on your trail runner profile?

In trail running, “the best” is subjective—it’s the pole that best fits your progression style, terrain, and energy management.

Choosing the right model means optimizing your investment (price), quality, and performance.

This practical guide helps you identify the carbon pole with the best Quality/Price/Performance ratio for your specific category.